Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It has been said that there is nothing new under the sun, but that is not so in the Sunshine State, where efforts to enact medical malpractice “reform” resemble a religious crusade.
Against the backdrop of incessant tort reform spanning over 20 years that has severely impaired a victim's ability to recover damages, laws passed in the last three years have rendered it difficult for plaintiffs' attorneys to accept any case that does not have elements of overwhelming liability, extensive damages and insurance coverage. However, the state and federal courts may now be pushing back.
Damage caps, presuit screening requirements, the abolition of joint and several liability, the elimination of medical malpractice wrongful death actions for unmarried adults, penalties for agreeing to or not agreeing to arbitrate and a shoddy financial responsibility law that allows doctors to practice without insurance were already in existence when, in 2011, the following laws were enacted: Further damage caps on Medicaid victims; out-of-state expert certification and discipline; private medical school immunity; the lifting of prohibitions against physicians vetoing their insurance carriers' settlement decisions; the inadmissibility of insurers' reimbursement policies; the inadmissibility of evidence of a violation of federal standards; and mandatory authorizations allowing defendants to obtain a patient's medical records during the presuit screening process.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.