Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Florida Pro-Provider Laws

By Kenneth J. Sobel
April 02, 2014

It has been said that there is nothing new under the sun, but that is not so in the Sunshine State, where efforts to enact medical malpractice “reform” resemble a religious crusade.

Against the backdrop of incessant tort reform spanning over 20 years that has severely impaired a victim's ability to recover damages, laws passed in the last three years have rendered it difficult for plaintiffs' attorneys to accept any case that does not have elements of overwhelming liability, extensive damages and insurance coverage. However, the state and federal courts may now be pushing back.

Damage caps, presuit screening requirements, the abolition of joint and several liability, the elimination of medical malpractice wrongful death actions for unmarried adults, penalties for agreeing to or not agreeing to arbitrate and a shoddy financial responsibility law that allows doctors to practice without insurance were already in existence when, in 2011, the following laws were enacted: Further damage caps on Medicaid victims; out-of-state expert certification and discipline; private medical school immunity; the lifting of prohibitions against physicians vetoing their insurance carriers' settlement decisions; the inadmissibility of insurers' reimbursement policies; the inadmissibility of evidence of a violation of federal standards; and mandatory authorizations allowing defendants to obtain a patient's medical records during the presuit screening process.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.