Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FTC: Professional Associations' Ethical Codes Restrict Competition
On Dec. 16, 2013, the FTC announced consent decrees settling charges that two professional associations, the Music Teachers National Association (MTNA) and the California Association of Legal Support Professionals (CALSPro), had violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by using their respective codes of ethics to restrain competition among association members. (Agreements Containing Consent Orders for In the Matter of Music Teachers National Assoc., File No. 131-0118 and In the Matter of California Association of Legal Support Professionals , File No. 131-0205). Specifically, the Commission charged both organizations with banning members from engaging in core competitive activities, such as soliciting or offering discounts to other members' clients, or recruiting other members' employees without first notifying the competing member.
Interested in-house counsel should take note that there is a long history of antitrust enforcement against professional associations that attempt to restrict their members' ability to compete effectively in the marketplace in the name of maintaining ethical standards. Courts have upheld (or at least refused to condemn short of full rule of reason analysis) association codes that arguably have some connection to procompetitive benefits, such as improving quality or protecting customers. Yet courts and agencies have not hesitated to condemn rules that limit price competition or the “poaching” of clients. The FTC's actions against MTNA and CALSPro, for instance, serve as a reminder that counsel who advise professional or trade associations or individual association members should carefully consider the antitrust risks posed by overly restrictive provisions of association ethical codes, and take some simple precautions that can help members achieve their goals while avoiding antitrust problems.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.