Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FTC: Professional Associations' Ethical Codes Restrict Competition
On Dec. 16, 2013, the FTC announced consent decrees settling charges that two professional associations, the Music Teachers National Association (MTNA) and the California Association of Legal Support Professionals (CALSPro), had violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by using their respective codes of ethics to restrain competition among association members. (Agreements Containing Consent Orders for In the Matter of Music Teachers National Assoc., File No. 131-0118 and In the Matter of California Association of Legal Support Professionals , File No. 131-0205). Specifically, the Commission charged both organizations with banning members from engaging in core competitive activities, such as soliciting or offering discounts to other members' clients, or recruiting other members' employees without first notifying the competing member.
Interested in-house counsel should take note that there is a long history of antitrust enforcement against professional associations that attempt to restrict their members' ability to compete effectively in the marketplace in the name of maintaining ethical standards. Courts have upheld (or at least refused to condemn short of full rule of reason analysis) association codes that arguably have some connection to procompetitive benefits, such as improving quality or protecting customers. Yet courts and agencies have not hesitated to condemn rules that limit price competition or the “poaching” of clients. The FTC's actions against MTNA and CALSPro, for instance, serve as a reminder that counsel who advise professional or trade associations or individual association members should carefully consider the antitrust risks posed by overly restrictive provisions of association ethical codes, and take some simple precautions that can help members achieve their goals while avoiding antitrust problems.
Background
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?