Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ljnstaff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 02, 2014

More Proceedings in $50 Million Birth Injury Case

A Georgia medical malpractice suit seeking $50 million in damages for a brain-damaged baby, Sutton v. Bauer , No. 2009A81944, alleged the child would not have been injured had he been delivered by cesarean section. The case was originally tried in August 2011 and ended with a hung jury. The defendants there included the obstetrician who delivered the injured baby, his practice group, OB-GYN Affiliates, and the hospital, WellStar Health System Inc. When the jurors were queried as they left the courthouse, they told plaintiff attorney Tommy Malone that they would have found WellStar blameless if they had been offered the opportunity to consider just that one defendant, independent of the doctor and his practice group. However, because they were divided as to the doctor's and practice group's liability, they could not come to a consensus. WellStar appealed the judge's decision not to allow a partial verdict but to declare a mistrial instead, but was unsuccessful. Since then, the hospital has settled with the plaintiffs. The remaining defendants were expected to argue in Georgia's Cobb County Court, as they did in the first trial, that a C-section was not clearly indicated, and that the baby's injuries more likely were caused by a pre-birth infection.


NC Surgical Patients Potentially Exposed to Lethal Disease

Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center of Winston-Salem, NC, announced in February that 18 surgical patients at its facility might have been exposed to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), a human form of the fatal brain-wasting disease in cows known as mad cow disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)). The possible exposure occurred when instruments used on a patient in mid-January, now confirmed to have CJD, were later used on another 18 neurosurgery patients. Although these implements were sterilized according to normal protocols, hospitals are supposed to use enhanced sterilization techniques when signs of CJD are present, and, according to a Novant Health release, “[t]here were reasons to suspect that this patient might have had CJD. As such, the extra precautions should have been taken, but were not.” See http://bit.ly/1da62Ic.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.