Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past decade a lot of effort and debate has gone into answering the question: How do we reduce the amount of data we need to review related to the production of documents? Solutions have focused on reviewing documents to produce, while incoming productions have been largely ignored.
Incoming productions are increasingly becoming a burden due to accelerated dockets, larger volumes and clients' reduced budgets. Furthermore, agreements between counsel to produce documents responsive to stipulated (usually overly broad) keywords shift the burden to the receiving party to separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff. When a production has been made without a review of the documents for relevancy, the density of relevant material can be quite low and the exercise to uncover it time-consuming and expensive.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.