Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 24, 2014, the Rent Stabilization Association, Community Housing Improvement Program, and certain property owners filed a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the numerous amendments that the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) promulgated to the Rent Stabilization Code (RSC) and Tenant Protection Regulations (TPR) on Jan. 8, 2014. In particular, the lawsuit challenges: 1) the creation and codification of the Tenant Protection Unit (TPU), an entity that is supposed to “proactively” enforce the rent-stabilization laws and regulations; and 2) various other amendments to the RSC and TPR (collectively, the “Regulations”) on the grounds that the newly enacted amendments conflict with the rent-stabilization laws codified by the New York City Council in 1969 and New York State Legislature in 1974 and/or constitute a violation of the separation of powers doctrine.
The 'Four-Year Rule'
DHCR's amendments to the “Four-Year Rule” (i.e., the four-year statute of limitations on actions concerning the overpayment of rent) provide an excellent example of how the plaintiffs claim that the amendments offend their constitutional rights. Indeed, the rent=stabilization laws make clear that: 1) owners of rent regulated properties (“Rent Regulated Owners) do not have to maintain records that are more than four years old; and 2) in the event there is an overcharge proceeding, neither the tenant nor DHCR is able to examine the rental histories, or challenge the validity of legal rents of properly filed rent registrations, beyond the statutory four-year period.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.