Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The recent decision in Sykes v. Sykes, 41 Misc.3d 1061 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2013), sent shock waves reverberating throughout the New York matrimonial bar for its direction that during the pendency of a divorce litigation, the less monied spouse may be required to use a portion of her share of the marital estate to pay her legal fees, rather than continue to have such fees paid by the wealthier spouse. The court's rationale in Sykes , as more fully detailed herein, was that because the wife was receiving significant pendente lite maintenance and child support, unless she was responsible for her own counsel fees, she had no incentive to resolve or move the case forward due to her lack of “skin in the game.”
As a result of the decision in Sykes, matrimonial practitioners are left contemplating when a court might apply this principal of “skin in the game.” This article addresses when and why a case may reach the tipping point that pushes it over the equal playing field presumption inherent in Domestic Relations Law (DRL) ' 237 to the “skin in the game” analysis, as described in Sykes. As will be explained, this different approach appears to depend largely on several factors, including the length of the action, the animosity between the parties, the parties' separate property assets, the legal fees the monied spouse has already paid, and the marital assets at issue.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.