Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The “restrictive,” “adaptive” and “collateral” approaches to a duty of good faith ' which were discussed in Part One of this article last month ' can be found in differing combinations and degrees in most of the civil jurisdictions in the European Union (EU), despite the fact that some of them have very different historical perspectives and approaches to the concept of good faith. The two primary “families” of civil law in Europe are German and French, and each approaches the concept of good faith in a different way. Last month we took a look at the German system; now, we turn to the French.
Bonne Foi: The French Approach to Good Faith
In France, although the general concept of good faith, or bonne foi, is found in Article 1134 of the French Civil Code, until the last quarter of the 20th century, it was substantially limited by the judicial view that “if a person says something it is fair” (“Qui dit Contractuel dit juste“). (Other provisions of French law also contain notions of good faith.)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?