Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Seventy three percent of online adults use at least one social networking site. Ninety percent of Generation Y (ages 18-29) use at least one social media platform. See Pew Research, “Social Networking Fact Sheet,” http://bit.ly/PUVhz4; Pew Research, “Social Media Update 2013,” http://bit.ly/OKvIzg. The information that users post on social media sites, for better or for worse, has the potential to reach a broad audience and reach it quickly. To use a well-known example, a former public relations director of corporate communication for a major company tweeted before boarding a plane, “Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS. Just kidding. I'm white!” and before she landed, that tweet had been retweeted over 3,000 times.
Social media also makes it easier than ever to connect and communicate with clients and co-workers and to disseminate information about a company's brand or services. Accordingly, employers should take steps to protect their social media presence, accounts, and contacts. While social media certainly has benefits, it also poses risks for employers when it comes to protecting their confidential information and trade secrets, particularly given social media's casual real-time feel that may lull employees into forgetting that all the restrictions that normally attach to work-related communications still apply. For example, work-related posts to social media are still subject to all relevant regulations, such as the SEC's Regulation FD, other regulatory requirements, and any policies the employer has in place regarding intellectual property, confidentiality, harassment, discrimination, and Internet use.
This article explores the developing law related to employee social media use and its effect on the confidentiality and protectability of employers' trade secrets and other proprietary information. It also provides suggestions for concrete steps employers can take to safeguard that information in the social media age.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.