Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
May 02, 2014

Board-Certified OB/GYNs May Treat Men After All

In response to reactions to its September, 2013 pronouncement that OB/GYN specialists certified by it were not permitted to treat male patients and could lose their certifications if they did so, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) recently reversed itself. In a Jan. 30 release describing ABOG's changed stance, the organization explained that the new definition of an obstetrician and gynecologist “eliminate[s] the requirement that ABOG-certified Diplomates treat only women and that they devote at least 75 percent of their practice to Obstetrics and Gynecology. Under the revised policy, Diplomates 'must devote the majority of their practice to the specialty of Obstetrics and Gynecology.'” Many had protested last year's new restrictions on their practices, noting that they sometimes were called upon to treat the male partners of women in their care, and that certain research studies involving both male and female participants appeared to be off-limits to Board-certified OB/GYNs.

ABOG's executive director, Dr. Larry Gilstrap, explained the reason for ABOG's about-face when he stated in the Board's Jan. 30 release that the issue of limiting members' practices to the treatment of women only “became a distraction to our mission to ensure that women receive high-quality and safe health care from certified obstetricians and gynecologists.”

Board-Certified OB/GYNs May Treat Men After All

In response to reactions to its September, 2013 pronouncement that OB/GYN specialists certified by it were not permitted to treat male patients and could lose their certifications if they did so, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) recently reversed itself. In a Jan. 30 release describing ABOG's changed stance, the organization explained that the new definition of an obstetrician and gynecologist “eliminate[s] the requirement that ABOG-certified Diplomates treat only women and that they devote at least 75 percent of their practice to Obstetrics and Gynecology. Under the revised policy, Diplomates 'must devote the majority of their practice to the specialty of Obstetrics and Gynecology.'” Many had protested last year's new restrictions on their practices, noting that they sometimes were called upon to treat the male partners of women in their care, and that certain research studies involving both male and female participants appeared to be off-limits to Board-certified OB/GYNs.

ABOG's executive director, Dr. Larry Gilstrap, explained the reason for ABOG's about-face when he stated in the Board's Jan. 30 release that the issue of limiting members' practices to the treatment of women only “became a distraction to our mission to ensure that women receive high-quality and safe health care from certified obstetricians and gynecologists.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.