Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Analyzing Child Custody Reports

BY Jeffrey P. Wittmann, David A. Martindale
June 02, 2014

This article is the first installment of a four-part series offering a model for attorneys to use when faced with the task of deconstructing a forensic custody assessment. Family law attorneys are familiar with that difficult moment when a child custody evaluation (CCE) by a mental health professional arrives at the courthouse with a “Conclusions” section that drops like a bomb on their client's case, suggesting that all may be lost. In other cases, a report's conclusions could not be more wonderful for their client, but it becomes apparent that the assessment was so poorly done that it will be easily dismantled on cross-examination. Either circumstance requires a thorough analysis of the forensic work-product to determine how to counsel the parent-litigant about the next step in his or her case.

A small body of literature suggests some of the areas most important to consider when analyzing a child custody report. It includes articles by Austin, Kirkpatrick, & Flens, (2011, Family Court Review' and by Gould, Kirkpatrick, Austin, & Martindale (2004, J Child Custody). More recently, the Custody Assessment Analysis System, or CAAS, provided a comprehensive system for the pre-trial analysis of CCEs by attorneys (Wittmann, 2013, MatLaw Corp.). The CAAS is grounded in the published parameters and guidelines of the forensic field, key forensic and psychological treatises, and research on clinical judgment. The inspection of an evaluator's report, focusing on the factors outlined below, produces a “red-flag” analysis: a catalog of deficiencies or threats to reliability that appear to characterize a particular assessment.

Simultaneous attention to the strengths in a particular report can also be quite instructive, by revealing ways in which it may be sturdy and unlikely to yield under attack. The CAAS model suggests four broad dimensions or lenses for such an analysis, dimensions that will structure the discussion in our four installments: Management of Professional Relationships, Data Adequacy, Technique Adequacy, and Reasoning Adequacy. The first of these dimensions is the focus of this installment.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.