Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: This is the fourth article in a series covering various aspects of intercreditor agreements.
My least favorite season is upon us. No, I am not talking about spring (or summer). I do not refer to the seemingly endless NBA and NHL playoffs. And, while afflicted thereby, I did not have in mind the continual onslaught of airborne allergens. Rather, it is once again electoral season in most parts of America.
The airwaves are full of countless advertisements canonizing some candidates and demonizing others. Numerous dinners are being interrupted with informal surveys and robocalls. Yards and streets are teeming with signs promoting certain individuals or ballot initiatives.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?