Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April 2011 Jenni Alvies ' a stay at home mom with four children ' started the blog “crossfitmamas.blgspot.com” and a Facebook page “CrossFit Mamas.” She used both social media sites to post information about high intensity workout routines and gathered a small following of women who would add comments about their own favorite exercise routines. In an effort to cover the cost of these sites (and no doubt to try to profit from her efforts), she also sold health shakes and smoothies and participated in the Google AdWords program.
CrossFit was formed in 2000 and licenses its name to gyms and certifies trainers. CrossFit promotes a “decentralized approach” consistent with an “virtual community Internet model” which allows for individual approaches. See, CrossFit Definition, Wikipedia, (last viewed May 23, 2014). There is a perception among at least some of its members and leaders that CrossFit is contrary to traditional views about exercise and wellness. Id.
How should CrossFit respond to Jenni Alvies? Is what she is doing consistent with the spirit of CrossFit and in essence an extension of what is going on within the CrossFit community? Or is Ms. Alvies trying to “rip off” CrossFit for her own financial benefit?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?