Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Common Interest Doctrine and the Investigation of First-Party Claims
It is essential for parties to be able to determine with a high degree of certainty whether or not communication will be protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. As the Supreme Court observed, “an uncertain privilege ' is little better than no privilege at all.” Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 393 (1981).
As we noted in an article earlier this year, a recent case in New York state court, National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. TransCanada Energy, USA, Nos. 650515/2010, 400759/2011, 2013 WL 4446917 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 15, 2013), aff'd 981 N.Y.S.2d 68, 69'70 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014), determined that the documents under review were not privileged, and went on to observe in dicta that the common interest doctrine would be inapplicable in a circumstance where there was no pending or reasonably anticipated litigation. That comment in TransCanada has the potential to raise uncertainty regarding the scope of protection in the context of the investigation and adjustment of insurance claims, while blurring the lines between attorney-client privilege, on the one hand, and work-product protection on the other. This article reviews the basic principles underlying each form of protection, addresses application of the common interest doctrine to those underlying protections, and discusses concepts key to the application of these protections and the common interest doctrine during the investigation of first-party insurance claims.
A Review of Basic Principles
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?