Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The employer mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which requires large employers to provide health insurance for their full-time employees or pay a penalty, is set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2015. (A special transition rule, described below, delays the effective date until 2016 for some of these large employers.) Regulations released by the Internal Revenue Service on Feb. 12, 2014, set forth the final rules that an employer must use to determine whether it is a large employer subject to the mandate. See, 79 Fed. Reg. 8543 (Feb. 12, 2014). With just over six months to go, the time is ripe for employers to determine whether they will be considered large employers and if so, to determine appropriate next steps.
A large employer is one that employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) on business days during the preceding calendar year. That is, whether an employer is a large employer in 2015 will depend on how many full-time employees and FTEs it employed on business days during 2014. An employer must take a number of steps in order to make this determination.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.