The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme ' to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a bank into paying him or her money nor that a risk of loss was posed to a bank. 18 U.S.C. ' 1344.
Bank Fraud Defined
The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to "knowingly execut[e] a scheme ' to obtain" property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank "by means of false or fraudulent pretenses," does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a bank into paying him or her money.
By
Stanley A. Twardy JR. And Elizabeth A. LatifThis premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN Business Crimes Bulletin
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
