Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last year, the Illinois legislature passed the Firearm Concealed Carry Act, 430 ILCS 66/1 et. seq . (the Illinois Act), and thereby became the 50th ' and last ' state in the Union to enact a law that authorizes its citizens to carry concealed firearms. Amid a landscape of wildly divergent opinions on the subject, concealed carry is now the law of the land, in some shape or form.
Despite the political fireworks that preceded its enactment, the core elements of the Illinois Act ' prohibitions and permissions, licensure requirements and exemptions ' are relatively noncontroversial. But when superimposed upon the landlord-tenant relationship, the Illinois Act may give rise to more questions than answers with respect to liability arising from persons carrying concealed weapons. For instance, the Illinois Act does not address the rights of tenants, if any, to enforce its terms against persons within leased premises. Illinois landlords should not only be aware of the basic rights afforded them under the Illinois Act, but also of the issues raised regarding the rights of other occupants of their properties.
Section 65(a-10) of the Illinois Act provides that an “owner of private real property of any type” is authorized to prohibit the carrying of concealed weapons on property “under his or her control.” 430 ILCS 66/65(a-10). The term “owner” is not defined under the statute, an omission that puts into question whether tenants of real property are entitled to enforce any rights under the Illinois Act. However, some industry groups have suggested that the rights of the owner may be inferred as applying to tenants as well, due to the fact that the lease confers upon the tenant control of the premises in question. If such an inference is valid, then it may follow that a property owner concedes its right to enforce Section 65(a-10) in areas of the property that are subject to leases, as “control” of those areas has been surrendered to the applicable tenant. In any event, the Illinois State Police have advised that the Illinois Act does not prohibit a property owner from designating to its tenant through an express lease provision the right to prohibit concealed firearms in the premises.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?