Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In litigation involving bodily injury, treating physicians, nurses and other providers are key witnesses. They have specialized knowledge of the plaintiff and her medical conditions, and, unlike expert witnesses, they have had the opportunity to examine and evaluate the plaintiff personally, outside of the litigation context. They can explain their unique shorthand or abbreviations in the medical records (or read their poor handwriting), provide detail behind the written medical records and lay the foundation for a defendant's causation and damages theories. Because ex parte meetings and discussions with treating physicians can be so informative, they are often seen as invaluable tools for any party permitted to meet with treating physicians.
However, as helpful as these discussions can be for parties who are permitted to meet with treating physicians, these discussions can also be particularly damaging and have long-term ramifications for a party that is unaware of or unable to participate in such meetings. They may also have legal and ethical consequences for parties that attempt to conduct such meetings without familiarizing themselves with the law of their particular jurisdiction.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.