Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While the term redaction is well known in the legal community and government agencies, the term itself is new to those not in the fields mentioned above. Because of improper redaction making its way into the headlines, more and more people are seeing the term. In the past, you would print the file and then manually redact it with a thick black marker. Lay people may have been redacting without even knowing what it meant to redact a file.
Redacting a file, whether that file is in paper or electronic form, is intended to permanently obfuscate private, sensitive, privileged, classified or other types of content. The reasons for redacting a file may be e-discovery, or the need to make a file public. Even prisons oftentimes redact inmate correspondence (although there has been much argument as to the constitutionality of that practice).
The operative word here is “permanent.” Any type of redaction method that can eventually lead to the discovery of the underlying text is not redaction at all. For that reason, and in the event a document is required at a later date, always redact a copy of the document in question.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?