Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Surviving the Medical Malpractice Claim
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell confidently strides to the podium, opens an envelope and intones, “With the number one pick in the 2014 NFL draft, the Houston Texans select ' ” Millions of eyes watched the latest NFL draft to see players picked by different teams and to critique those choices. Truth is, millions of dollars and reputations are at stake in making sound selection decisions.
In this respect, the NFL draft has much in common with selecting defense counsel in medical malpractice cases. Like any NFL franchise, the physician and medical malpractice insurer want to make sure that they make sound “first-round draft picks.” These picks can be successful or they can be a bust. Making bone-headed selections can cost millions of dollars in professional reputations if an attorney ends up mishandling a medical malpractice case.
Successful defense of a medical malpractice case is a team effort. While the defendant physician is the focal point, a key team member is the defense attorney who will defend the physician and the standard of care exhibited in the case. Thus, a key step in surviving and winning a medical malpractice lawsuit is wisely choosing the defense attorney who may ultimately enter a courtroom on the physician's behalf to defend what the practitioner did or did not do.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?