Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Arbitration Provision Read Into SAG-AFTRA Limited Exhibition Agreement
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that an independent film producer was bound to arbitrate disputes between it and SAG-AFTRA under the guild's Independent Producers' Limited Exhibition Letter Agreement. Screen Actors Guild ' American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) v. Goldade Productions Inc., 2:14-cv-04843. The letter agreement stated: “It is agreed that this letter is part of the [SAG Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)], and by executing this letter, the undersigned Producer and Screen Actors Guild ' shall be deemed to have executed” the CBA. SAG-AFTRA won an arbitration award against Goldade for failure to pay monies owed from distribution of Goldade's movie Sex and the Teenage Mind beyond the territory cited in the letter agreement. Confirming the award, District Judge Otis D. Wright II noted: “While this Letter Agreement does not include its own arbitration clause, section 3 of the Agreement provides that 'all the terms of [the CBA] apply as described above [in the Letter Agreement] except as hereby modified.' This means that the Limited Exhibition Letter Agreement operated as a modification of the CBA's terms ' or, in other words, the parties incorporated the Letter Agreement into the CBA. Since Goldade agreed to arbitrate disputes involving interpretation of the CBA, it follows that it agreed to arbitrate disputes concerning the incorporated Letter Agreement.”
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled that the posting of a photograph that was on a DVD cover, to accompany a website article about a lawsuit involving the video, was a copyright fair use. Leveyfilm Inc. v. Fox Sports Interactive Media LLC, 13 C 4664. In the 1980s, Jay Levey photographed a group of Chicago Bears football players for the cover of an album on which they performed the rap song “Super Bowl Shuffle.” The photo was also used on the cover of a 20th anniversary DVD edition of a video of the football players rapping the song. After an owner of the video sued alleging unauthorized use by another party, Danielle Wysocki wrote an article about the case that she published on her website www.thejerseychaser.com. She downloaded a copy of the Levey DVD cover photo to post alongside her article. Wysokci's website is linked through an affiliate agreement to Fox Sport's www.yardbarker.com. When Levey sued Fox Sports for copyright infringement, the Fox Sports defendants raised a fair use defense. Dismissing the suit, District Judge Thomas M. Durkin found: “With regard to the purpose and character of the use at issue here, ' Wysocki sought to write specifically about the Super Bowl Shuffle lawsuit which concerned illegal use of the video contained on the DVD. To a dispositive degree, the photo ' due to its attachment to the DVD cover of the video at the center of the lawsuit ' had become the news story itself.”
Arbitration Provision Read Into SAG-AFTRA Limited Exhibition Agreement
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that an independent film producer was bound to arbitrate disputes between it and SAG-AFTRA under the guild's Independent Producers' Limited Exhibition Letter Agreement. Screen Actors Guild ' American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) v. Goldade Productions Inc., 2:14-cv-04843. The letter agreement stated: “It is agreed that this letter is part of the [SAG Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)], and by executing this letter, the undersigned Producer and Screen Actors Guild ' shall be deemed to have executed” the CBA. SAG-AFTRA won an arbitration award against Goldade for failure to pay monies owed from distribution of Goldade's movie Sex and the Teenage Mind beyond the territory cited in the letter agreement. Confirming the award, District Judge
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled that the posting of a photograph that was on a DVD cover, to accompany a website article about a lawsuit involving the video, was a copyright fair use.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.