Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article addresses the dynamics of New Jersey's Collateral Source doctrine and defendant physician's entitlement to a credit for a settlement that a plaintiff reached in another jurisdiction.
Background
On Dec. 1, 2004, the infant plaintiff, Jonathan Doubletree (Jonathan) was born at Double Down Hospital in Yonkers, NY. Thereafter, Jonathan and his parents (collectively Plaintiffs) resided in Queens until Jan. 2006, when they moved to Short Hills, NJ. While they were living in Queens, New York physicians treated Jonathan. After moving to New Jersey, Jonathan began treating with Melvin Hart, M.D. (Dr. Hart). The latter treated Jonathan from January 2006 until February 2007. When Jonathan was 25 months old, Dr. Hart diagnosed him with developmental left hip dysplasia. In March 2007, Jonathan underwent a left hip open reduction.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.