Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Med Mal News
$12 million Verdict for Simple Hernia Surgery That Went Bad
A Connecticut jury recently awarded a woman $12 million, the largest personal injury award ever to come out of the Danbury, CT, Judicial District. The plaintiff had gone into defendant Danbury Hospital for a routine outpatient hernia operation but ended up spending 34 days in the intensive care unit and 36 more days in the hospital after her laparoscopic surgery went wrong.
The plaintiff's troubles began when her surgeon, Dr. Gordon, handed over the bladeless optical trocar device being used in the procedure to a medical resident, who told Dr. Gordon that he had used one before. According to plaintiff attorney Sean McElligott, of Bridgeport, CT's Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, it soon became apparent that the resident did not know what he was doing. And although Dr. Gordon stepped in as soon as he saw that the resident was not competent to perform the procedure, he did not notice that damage had already been done. The surgeon therefore finished the operation and sent the patient to recovery. Thirty-six hours later, the plaintiff showed signs of infection, and an operation was required. It revealed that the woman's abdomen had filled with fecal matter.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?