Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Supreme Court Upholds Lanham Act Claim in Juice Wars

Pomegranate juice is the subject of an intense legal battle between POM Wonderful and Coca-Cola Co. In its Lanham Act challenge, POM alleges that Coke's juice product's name, label, marketing and advertising mislead consumers into thinking the product is mostly a pomegranate and blueberry juice when it in fact is mostly apple and grape juice.

28 minute read August 01, 2014 at 01:55 PM
By
Kyle-Beth Hilfer
Supreme Court Upholds Lanham Act Claim in Juice Wars

Pomegranate juice is the subject of an intense legal battle between POM Wonderful, LLC (POM) and Coca-Cola Company (Coke).

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Intellectual Property Strategist

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Notice of Pendency Provided Constructive Notice to Foreclosure Sale Purchaser

September 01, 2026

Zoning Board Properly Construed OrdinanceNeighbors’ Open Meetings Law Challenge to Lease to Wireless Character Was UntimelyPlanning Board Not Bound to Consider Approval’s Impact on Easement or Covenant

September 01, 2026

Tax Escalation Clause Does Not Entitle Landlord to Collect Additional Rent On Taxes Landlord Did Not PayGood Guy Guaranty Does Not Cover Obligations Accruing After SurrenderStipulation In Prior Proceeding Did Not Bar Use and Occupancy ClaimFlooding Was Outside the Scope of Landlord’s Responsibility

September 01, 2026