Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Failure to Diagnose
The “bread and butter” of medical malpractice litigation is the failure to diagnose a case. According to the data from the National Practitioner Data Bank, failure-to-diagnose claims (one variant of which is “misdiagnosis”) accounted for a third of all malpractice payouts, the highest of any category. In some specialties, the figures reflect the national data ' failure to diagnose accounts for a little over a third of emergency medicine malpractice claims (Brown TW, et al., An Epidemiologic Study of Closed Emergency Department Malpractice Claims in a National Database of Physician Malpractice Insurers. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60, http://1.usa.gov/1ri9MZW). But in others, the failure to diagnose is pretty much the only show in town. Diagnosis errors account for over 70% of primary care malpractice claims. Schiff, G.D., et al., Primary Care Closed Claims Experience of Massachusetts Malpractice Insurers. JAMA Intern. Med . 2013 Dec 9-23;173(22):2063-8. http://1.usa.gov/1r5ecrY.
Failure to diagnose is also, perhaps, the most controversial type of malpractice claim. Politically, it is the most common reason given for assertions of “defensive medicine.” Personally, it appears ' in my anecdotal experience, at least ' to be the type of claim doctors themselves focus on the most when they complain about medical malpractice. It just seems so unfair, they say, to be judged for getting a diagnosis wrong after the fact if they put in a good-faith effort. “Hindsight is 20/20,” and so on and so forth; my favorite medical description of making a diagnosis with the benefit of hindsight is “using the retrospectroscope.”
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.