Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Appropriate Interest Rate Under ' 506(b)
“A loaf of bread, a container of milk, and a stick of butter.” This Sesame Street sound bite, lodged in the deepest recesses of our brains, to be sure, came to mind after reviewing the recent decision rendered by Judge Martin Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in the Chapter 11 cases of Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap) on the oft-disputed issue of the appropriate interest rate calculation under Section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. We heard in our minds Judge Glenn repeating, over and over, “rebuttable presumption, equitable considerations, and a balancing of the equities.”
We all know what the issue is. Section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that over-secured creditors are entitled to receive post-petition interest, but it does not tell us what interest rate should be applied. Aye, there's the rub. Indeed, Congress' failure to provide the appropriate interest rate has triggered numerous disputes in many different jurisdictions as to whether: 1) the appropriate rate should be the contract rate, the Federal judgment rate, or some other rate altogether; and 2) regardless of which rate is selected, will the award of post-petition interest harm other creditors? This article explores the specific facts and circumstances that Judge Glenn considered and ultimately relied upon when deciding to rule in favor of Citibank, playing the role of secured creditor in the case, granting, for the most part, its request to receive post-petition interest at the default rate governed by its contract.
The ResCap Facts
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?