Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On June 10, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a 168-page post-trial opinion determining that it would equitably subordinate the claims of SP Special Opportunities LLC (SPSO) against LightSquared. LightSquared LP, et. al. v. SP Special Opportunities LLC, et. al., 511 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. 2014). The court reserved for later determination the amount to be equitably subordinated. Id. at 315, 361.
The court's opinion explained that SPSO, under the control of Charles Ergen, the founder, Board chair and controlling shareholder of Dish Network, had acquired $844 million of senior secured debt of LightSquared LP. 511 B.R. at 279, ”88, 89. Two hundred eighty seven million dollars of the face amount of the debt purchases occurred prior to the filing of the LightSquared bankruptcy cases on May 14, 2012, for a purchase price of $172 million. Id. at 274, '63. The purchases were made at a time when there were restrictions on the holders of LightSquared secured debt to preclude its competitors from holding that debt, and SPSO was aware of, and was created to, navigate those restrictions. Id. at 345-346.
There are a series of other decisions in the LightSquared case, including one issued on July 11, 2014, that denied confirmation of a plan, and addressed designation of votes under Section 1126(e); classification; unfair discrimination; fair and equitable standards; and indubitable equivalence. The discussion of the applicable law in these decisions is extensive and thorough. Because of their length and depth, dissecting these decisions in this article is not possible. For the same reasons, this article does not address subsequently reported developments such as resignations by certain members of the Board of LightSquared, filing of lawsuits, apparent settlements, and submission of competing plans.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.