Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Verdicts

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 02, 2014

New Theory of Liability Cannot Defeat Summary Judgment Motion

Summary dismissal of a suit against a hospital was proper where the plaintiff presented no evidence to back her pleaded theory of liability, but instead produced an expert opinion concerning a second theory of which the defendant hospital had not been informed. Tam v. Garfield Medical Center Inc., 2014 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5149 (Cal.App.2d, 7/22/14).

The plaintiff's father, Hung Sun Tam (Mr. Tam), suffered abdominal and shoulder injuries in a car accident. Prior to undergoing emergency surgery to address these issues, Mr. Tam, who was then alert, stable and able to communicate, was given a dose of Morphine. According to his daughter's complaint for wrongful death and medical malpractice, the Morphine caused his blood pressure to drop immediately, causing him to go into cardiac respiratory arrest. Mr. Tam was then intubated and sent to the operating room with instructions to resuscitate, and his planned surgeries were completed. According to the plaintiff, following surgery Mr. Tam was sent to the intensive care unit, where a “pulmonary consultation revealed that Mr. Tam was in a deep coma” and he “died shortly thereafter, on the same day he was admitted.” In her suit brought in Superior Court, Los Angeles County, the plaintiff alleged that the doctor responsible for administering Morphine to her father and the hospital at which her father was treated, Garfield Medical Center Inc., thereby caused his death.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.