Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Rule 2004

By Jeffrey R. Gleit and Brian F. Moore
October 02, 2014

Rule 2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Bankruptcy Rule 2004) is a crucial pre-litigation discovery tool to investigate potential Avoidance Actions ' causes of action under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code ' in light of the stringent federal Twombly/Iqbal pleading requirements that are applicable in bankruptcy litigation, and which effectively makes it more difficult for debtors and trustees to sufficiently plead claims for relief.

Specifically, in Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, the Supreme Court adopted a heightened “plausibility” standard requiring a plaintiff's claim to provide “more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action” in order to survive a motion to dismiss. 550 U.S. 544, 545 (2007). Subsequently, in Ashcroft v. Iqbal , the Supreme Court then clarified the “plausibility” standard enunciated in Twombly, by holding that “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” for a plaintiff to prevail on a motion to dismiss. 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).

Stricter Scrutiny By the Courts

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.