Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Condominium's Assessments For Capital Improvements
Rogan LLC v. YHD Bowery Commercial Unit LLC
NYLJ 7/16/14, p. 21, col. 1
Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty.
(Bannon, J.)
In a declaratory judgment action brought by commercial tenant against owner of the leased condominium space, both parties sought summary judgment. The court granted tenant's partial summary judgment motion, holding that the lease did not obligate tenant to pay any portion of the condominium's assessment for capital improvements.
In 2008, tenant leased retail space on the first floor of a building for a seven-year term. Landlord subsequently converted the building to condominium ownership, and sold the retail unit. Purchaser of the retail unit took subject to tenant's lease. In 2013, the condominium's board approved a fa'ade restoration capital improvement assessment of nearly $3 million, and assessed the commercial space $858,169.15 as its share of the assessment. Owner of the retail unit demanded that commercial tenant pay 51.62% of that amount, but tenant refused. Tenant ultimately vacated the premises pursuant to a written stipulation reserving all rights and remedies. Tenant then brought this action for a declaration that it was not liable for any portion of the fa'ade restoration assessment.
In granting partial summary judgment to commercial tenant, the court emphasized language in the lease exempting tenant from contributing to costs for capital improvements, and in particular for costs incurred in connection with renovation projects underway and planned for the condominium project. Based on this language, the court concluded that commercial tenant was not liable for any or the renovation assessment.
'
Condominium's Assessments For Capital Improvements
Rogan LLC v. YHD Bowery Commercial Unit LLC
NYLJ 7/16/14, p. 21, col. 1
Supreme Ct., N.Y. Cty.
(Bannon, J.)
In a declaratory judgment action brought by commercial tenant against owner of the leased condominium space, both parties sought summary judgment. The court granted tenant's partial summary judgment motion, holding that the lease did not obligate tenant to pay any portion of the condominium's assessment for capital improvements.
In 2008, tenant leased retail space on the first floor of a building for a seven-year term. Landlord subsequently converted the building to condominium ownership, and sold the retail unit. Purchaser of the retail unit took subject to tenant's lease. In 2013, the condominium's board approved a fa'ade restoration capital improvement assessment of nearly $3 million, and assessed the commercial space $858,169.15 as its share of the assessment. Owner of the retail unit demanded that commercial tenant pay 51.62% of that amount, but tenant refused. Tenant ultimately vacated the premises pursuant to a written stipulation reserving all rights and remedies. Tenant then brought this action for a declaration that it was not liable for any portion of the fa'ade restoration assessment.
In granting partial summary judgment to commercial tenant, the court emphasized language in the lease exempting tenant from contributing to costs for capital improvements, and in particular for costs incurred in connection with renovation projects underway and planned for the condominium project. Based on this language, the court concluded that commercial tenant was not liable for any or the renovation assessment.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.