Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Some 75 years after the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), an overhaul is imminent and it will fundamentally affect product liability litigation practice. The proposed amendments are categorized into early, active, and sustained judicial case management; discovery practice addressing scope, proportionality, and sanctions; and cooperation by lawyers in an adversarial process. The article herein takes up the first two, in that order. The amendments involving cooperation between lawyers are much more modest.
This article explains the most important amendments. The focus is primarily on discovery, because that is the crux of so many product liability cases, and the discovery amendments are more far-reaching. The cases have involved unduly burdensome discovery, and skirmishes over sanctions that have troubled courts, practitioners and companies alike. They have struggled to sort through a morass of conflicting standards over the duties of preservation of evidence (especially electronically stored information, dubbed ESI), the standards for imposing discovery sanctions, and the severity of the sanctions. The amendments should alleviate these problems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.