Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A bankruptcy judge recently held that lessors of a debtor's corporate headquarters were not entitled to administrative expense priority under 11 U.S.C. ' 365(d)(3) for 25 days of unpaid “stub rent” for the period between the Chapter 11 petition and the first post-petition rent payment. In re Oreck (Bankr. D. Tenn., Mar. 10, 2014). The court held that the lessors' stub rent claim was a prepetition debt that was not within the scope of ' 365(d)(3) and was not entitled to administrative expense priority under section 503(b)(1).
Does the Billing Date Method or Proration Approach Apply?
“Stub Rent” has been defined as the amount due a commercial landlord for a period of occupancy and use between the petition date and the first post-petition rent payment. In re Goody's Family Clothing Inc., 610 F.3d 812, 815 (3d Cir. 2010). In Goody's, the court said that while the Bankruptcy Code does not address the landlord's remedy if a debtor-tenant fails to pay post-petition rent as ' 365(d)(3) requires, most courts have held that the landlord may recover rent by filing an automatic administrative expense claim.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?