Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

<b><i>Online Extra</b></i>Browsewrap Agreements Not Vehicles for Abritration Clauses

Arbitration clauses hidden in website terms of use agreements are not enforceable.

6 minute read October 01, 2014 at 11:07 AM
By
Marlisse Silver Sweeney
<b><i>Online Extra</b></i>Browsewrap Agreements Not Vehicles for Abritration Clauses

Businesses wanting to bind consumers to arbitration clauses should not hide them in website terms of use agreements, according to a recent'post'on the Socially Aware blog by Morrison Foerster partner John Delaney and Sherman Kahn of Mauriel Kapouytian Woods.

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026