Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Often, tenants negotiate exclusives that prevent landlords from leasing space, or approving assignments or sublets for a similar use or prohibited uses. Such exclusive provisions effectively prevent certain uses in the shopping center, which a tenant may find either offensive or detrimental to the value of the center. These provisions, reasonable at the time of negotiation, can sometimes become outdated quickly as new business ideas develop, unforeseen by landlords and their attorneys. Recently, this phenomenon has been particularly pronounced with the growth of certain unconventional shopping center tenants.
Urgent Care Clinics
An example of an increasingly common unconventional tenant is the urgent care center. In the past, many landlords would routinely grant restrictions to requesting tenants who wanted to prohibit medical uses in certain shopping centers. Tenants would ask for these restrictions to protect the “retail” nature of the center due to concerns that medical offices do not create the same synergy as a typical tenant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?