Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The scholarly research concerning the economic effects of divorce has been referenced by politicians, lawyers, judges, activists, and many other people. However, researchers have disagreed not only with the results of the analyses, but with how to define the fundamental components of their research, such as the “standard of living.” If the meaning of the term “standard of living” is not well defined, it is difficult to compare the research results of different studies. This article provides an overview of some of the seminal research articles in the area of the economic consequences of divorce, and an individualized framework for assessing the possible consequences of divorce for a particular person.
An Overview of Scholarly Research
In the past, a widely cited source regarding the economic consequences of divorce was Harvard sociologist Lenore Weitzman, PhD's book, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (Free Pr; September 1985). Since its publication, certain statistics found within the book have been discredited. Nonetheless, the book left a mark on policymakers and possibly the public in general.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?