Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Apple Inc., Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp. are putting new pressure on Congress to update a 28-year-old law that governs how the federal government can obtain U.S. citizens' electronic data.
The technology giants joined dozens of tech companies, civil liberties groups and other organizations last month in calls to congressional leaders to hold votes on Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) reform bills. The measures, which were introduced last year, have bipartisan support in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate.
The House legislation, the Email Privacy Act, from Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS), has 263 Republican and Democratic cosponsors but is pending in committee. The Senate bill, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act, from Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), has six Republican and Democratic cosponsors and is waiting for consideration by the full Senate.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?