Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For much of America, exposure to some type of social media is a part of everyday life. Fifty-seven percent of all American adults use Facebook ' the most preferred social networking site (or SNS) ' and 52% of Internet users who do not use Facebook live with someone who does. Sixty-four percent of Facebook users visit the site on a daily basis. (6 New Facts About Facebook, Feb. 3, 2014, http://tinyurl.com/kv8vyop. Pew Research Center, Social Media Update 2013, Dec. 30, 2013, http://tinyurl.com/ngkvy98).
Reasons for such use include viewing photos or videos, sharing things with many people at once, receiving support from people in their network, getting feedback on content they have posted, and keeping up with news and current events. (Pew Research Center's Internet Project Survey, Aug. 7-Sept. 16, 2013, http://tinyurl.com/kv8vyop).
Because social media is a major vehicle for interacting with the world and exchanging information, it is no surprise that such a ubiquitous aspect of American culture would contain information relevant to litigation. It is therefore important that attorneys be able to recognize when and how social media content may provide valuable evidence in a case. Indeed, the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility suggest it is an attorney's obligation to become familiar with social media technology and the benefits and risks of its use. See Model Rules of Prof'l Conduct Rule 1.1 cmt. This article looks at how to request social media content in discovery as well how best to preserve and collect such content in the context of employment litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.