Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Employee Noncompete Agreements
Often overlooked assets in bankruptcy sales are the noncompete agreements or noncompete covenants in employment contracts that debtors have with certain employees. Due to the low number of reported cases addressing the treatment of noncompete agreements in bankruptcy sales and abundance of conflicting precedents across different states, it is important for attorneys and their clients to anticipate and address these issues early in the bankruptcy sale process in order to avoid costly litigation and legal uncertainty.
Several different persons ' including the debtors, asset purchasers, stalking horse bidders, and, of course, employees ' may have an interest in how these agreements are handled in bankruptcy sales, making them increasingly relevant in bankruptcy sales considering that The New York Times recently reported they are on the rise (Steven Greenhouse, Noncompete Clauses Increasingly Pop Up in Array of Jobs, N.Y. Times, June 9, 2014, at B1).
- A debtor who is not selling all its assets may wish to retain valued employees to operate the remaining business. Alternatively, the noncompete can be an additional asset having added value that can be realized for the debtor's estate.
- A purchaser seeking to realize the going concern value of the debtor's assets may want to retain the key employees who operate those assets. Furthermore, a purchaser may not want to see key employees of the debtor go to a business competitor.
- A stalking horse bidder does not always end up being the purchaser of the debtor's assets. Nevertheless, during the course of its due diligence, it may come across employees of the debtor whom it would like to hire. Whether it may hire these employees depends, among other things, on the legal status of any noncompete agreements after the assets are sold.
- The employee who agreed to a noncompete as a condition to his employment with the debtor may not wish to work for the purchaser of the debtor's assets. Can he be forced to do so or must he find employment in another field or another place?
Following are some helpful considerations for attorneys to keep in mind when counseling clients in these matters.
The Bankruptcy Sale Process
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.