Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
How One Firm Tracked an Oligarch and Billions in Fraud
For five years, a team at international law firm Hogan Lovells tracked the wild financial peregrinations of a Kazakh oligarch suspected of running a $10 billion fraud. Mukhtar Ablyazov started by looting his bank and continued by creating a global network of shell companies to hide the proceeds. To end that run, the Hogan Lovells lawyers chased his henchmen across the world with derring-do of a James Bond movie. But this is more than a cloak-and-dagger story. In legal consequence, which is the metric that matters most, BTA v. Ablyazov earned The American Lawyer's Global Dispute of the Year grand prize on the merits.
More than 50 reported UK decisions in Ablyazov have carved out 26 entries in the White Book, the official compendium of English civil procedure. No other case has notched more than 10. The English Court of Appeal called it “extraordinary litigation on a large scale,” pursued with a vigor akin to “trench warfare.” A panel of 25 top London barristers, polled by Sonia Tolaney of 3 Verulam Buildings, called it the most ground-breaking recent case by common consensus.
In a nutshell, Tolaney says, Ablyazov stands for the notion that “English courts will show the needed flexibility to fashion remedies to catch the modern, evasive, and technologically able fraudster.” To catch a slippery Kazakh banker, Hogan Lovells sought and received remedies that were once unthinkable even in the United Kingdom. London was already a destination for fraud enforcement. The forecast for fraudsters just got decidedly dimmer.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?