Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

IP News

Federal Circuit Defines "By Means Of" <br/>Doctrine of Claim Differentiation Insufficient to Overcome Plain Meaning of Claim Term<br/>Patentee's Failure to Connect the Dots Insufficient, But Not Sanction-Worthy

20 minute read November 01, 2014 at 01:22 PM
By
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg And Wyatt Delfino
IP News

Federal Circuit Defines “By Means Of”

On Oct.14, 2014, a Federal Circuit panel made up of Judges Taranto and Hughes, and Chief Judge Prost, issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Chief Judge Prost, in Robert Bosch, LLC v.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Intellectual Property Strategist

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026