Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Landlord & Tenant

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 02, 2014

Modifications to Lease Did Not Release Guarantor

4 USS LLC v. DSW MS LLC

NYLJ 9/15/14, p. 22, col. 4

AppDiv, First Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In successor landlord's action against tenant's guarantor for breach of contract, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed and granted landlord's motion, holding that modifications to the lease did not release guarantor from its contract obligations.

Landlord's predecessor leased premises on Union Square South to Filene's Basement. Guarantor executed a guarantor of Filene's leasehold obligations. By its terms the guaranty provided that the guarantor's obligations would not be affected by a lease modification or by any bankruptcy of the tenant. The only qualification was that a modification or a bankruptcy would not operate to increase the guarantor's liability. In fact, Filene's and its affiliates, including Filene's Basement, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, and the bankruptcy court ordered Filene's to assign the lease to SYL, which entered into a lease modification agreement with landlord. Subsequently, SYL defaulted on the lease and itself entered into bankruptcy proceedings. Current landlord then sued guarantor on the guarantee. Supreme Court denied landlord's summary judgment motion, and landlord appealed.

In reversing and awarding summary judgment to landlord, the Appellate Division rejected guarantor's argument that the lease modification was such a material and unexpected departure from the terms of the original lease that the modification abrogated the guarantee. The court emphasized that landlord was not seeking recovery of any of SYL's obligations under the modification. Instead, guarantor's obligations had already been triggered by Filene's default under the original lease, and landlord conceded that guarantor's obligations were capped at the amount of the original lease. As a result, landlord was entitled to summary judgment on the breach of contract issue, with a referee to determine landlord's damages.

'

Modifications to Lease Did Not Release Guarantor

4 USS LLC v. DSW MS LLC

NYLJ 9/15/14, p. 22, col. 4

AppDiv, First Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In successor landlord's action against tenant's guarantor for breach of contract, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed and granted landlord's motion, holding that modifications to the lease did not release guarantor from its contract obligations.

Landlord's predecessor leased premises on Union Square South to Filene's Basement. Guarantor executed a guarantor of Filene's leasehold obligations. By its terms the guaranty provided that the guarantor's obligations would not be affected by a lease modification or by any bankruptcy of the tenant. The only qualification was that a modification or a bankruptcy would not operate to increase the guarantor's liability. In fact, Filene's and its affiliates, including Filene's Basement, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, and the bankruptcy court ordered Filene's to assign the lease to SYL, which entered into a lease modification agreement with landlord. Subsequently, SYL defaulted on the lease and itself entered into bankruptcy proceedings. Current landlord then sued guarantor on the guarantee. Supreme Court denied landlord's summary judgment motion, and landlord appealed.

In reversing and awarding summary judgment to landlord, the Appellate Division rejected guarantor's argument that the lease modification was such a material and unexpected departure from the terms of the original lease that the modification abrogated the guarantee. The court emphasized that landlord was not seeking recovery of any of SYL's obligations under the modification. Instead, guarantor's obligations had already been triggered by Filene's default under the original lease, and landlord conceded that guarantor's obligations were capped at the amount of the original lease. As a result, landlord was entitled to summary judgment on the breach of contract issue, with a referee to determine landlord's damages.

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.