Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Modifications to Lease Did Not Release Guarantor
4 USS LLC v. DSW MS LLC
NYLJ 9/15/14, p. 22, col. 4
AppDiv, First Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In successor landlord's action against tenant's guarantor for breach of contract, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed and granted landlord's motion, holding that modifications to the lease did not release guarantor from its contract obligations.
Landlord's predecessor leased premises on Union Square South to Filene's Basement. Guarantor executed a guarantor of Filene's leasehold obligations. By its terms the guaranty provided that the guarantor's obligations would not be affected by a lease modification or by any bankruptcy of the tenant. The only qualification was that a modification or a bankruptcy would not operate to increase the guarantor's liability. In fact, Filene's and its affiliates, including Filene's Basement, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, and the bankruptcy court ordered Filene's to assign the lease to SYL, which entered into a lease modification agreement with landlord. Subsequently, SYL defaulted on the lease and itself entered into bankruptcy proceedings. Current landlord then sued guarantor on the guarantee. Supreme Court denied landlord's summary judgment motion, and landlord appealed.
In reversing and awarding summary judgment to landlord, the Appellate Division rejected guarantor's argument that the lease modification was such a material and unexpected departure from the terms of the original lease that the modification abrogated the guarantee. The court emphasized that landlord was not seeking recovery of any of SYL's obligations under the modification. Instead, guarantor's obligations had already been triggered by Filene's default under the original lease, and landlord conceded that guarantor's obligations were capped at the amount of the original lease. As a result, landlord was entitled to summary judgment on the breach of contract issue, with a referee to determine landlord's damages.
'
Modifications to Lease Did Not Release Guarantor
4 USS LLC v. DSW MS LLC
NYLJ 9/15/14, p. 22, col. 4
AppDiv, First Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In successor landlord's action against tenant's guarantor for breach of contract, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed and granted landlord's motion, holding that modifications to the lease did not release guarantor from its contract obligations.
Landlord's predecessor leased premises on Union Square South to Filene's Basement. Guarantor executed a guarantor of Filene's leasehold obligations. By its terms the guaranty provided that the guarantor's obligations would not be affected by a lease modification or by any bankruptcy of the tenant. The only qualification was that a modification or a bankruptcy would not operate to increase the guarantor's liability. In fact, Filene's and its affiliates, including Filene's Basement, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, and the bankruptcy court ordered Filene's to assign the lease to SYL, which entered into a lease modification agreement with landlord. Subsequently, SYL defaulted on the lease and itself entered into bankruptcy proceedings. Current landlord then sued guarantor on the guarantee. Supreme Court denied landlord's summary judgment motion, and landlord appealed.
In reversing and awarding summary judgment to landlord, the Appellate Division rejected guarantor's argument that the lease modification was such a material and unexpected departure from the terms of the original lease that the modification abrogated the guarantee. The court emphasized that landlord was not seeking recovery of any of SYL's obligations under the modification. Instead, guarantor's obligations had already been triggered by Filene's default under the original lease, and landlord conceded that guarantor's obligations were capped at the amount of the original lease. As a result, landlord was entitled to summary judgment on the breach of contract issue, with a referee to determine landlord's damages.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.