Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Stop it.
It is likely that a dispassionate examination of both the intended and unintended, positive and negative, effects on the custody evaluation process of pre-evaluation litigant preparation by forensic mental health consultants (FMHCs), would lead to one conclusion: the probability that evaluators will develop distorted views of prepared litigants exceeds the probability that evaluators will develop more accurate views. There will be times when litigants will experience transitory anxiety, triggered by an impending evaluation, and this anxiety will impair their ability to present themselves in a natural (and positive) manner. This, in turn, may lead to an inaccurate assessment. When litigants are troubled by transitory anxiety, however, they are more likely to secure needed assistance from a skilled treatment provider than from a FMHC.
The Appeal and the Risk
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?