Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Third Circuit has reversed a district court on an issue that “implicates a core concern animating” the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing, No. 13-3588. (Aug. 28).
The Ruling
Convergent Outsourcing, a debt collection company, violated the FDCPA by including a consumer's account number in the address window visible through the front of an envelope, the Third Circuit ruled. The district court had decided that the number would fall under a “benign language exception.” The Third Circuit did not dispose with the exception itself, but it did hold that a person's account number would not be considered benign language.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?