Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past decade, healthcare real estate has come to be viewed as a new asset category, in addition to the traditional office, industrial, retail and multifamily categories. While there are many reasons for this, one contributing factor is the number of issues unique to healthcare real estate. Among the many types of healthcare real estate transactions, this article focuses on “off-campus” leasing transactions, including why and how leases involving healthcare providers differ from other leasing transactions and what this means for those involved in these transactions.
Why Should You Care?
There are three reasons that you should understand the ways in which healthcare leases differ from other kinds of leasing: Costs, Liability and Opportunities. Knowing the hot buttons and constraints specific to healthcare tenants will facilitate lease negotiations and enable the parties to pick their battles more wisely, which in turn may save weeks of negotiations and attorneys' fees, and avoid inadequate or problematic lease provisions. Knowing that healthcare tenants may produce biological/medical waste, use regulated substances as an ordinary part of their business and have extensive, statutorily mandated patient confidentiality obligations will enable the parties to address responsibility and liability for these matters appropriately. Knowing that market and cost pressures and the Affordable Care Act are changing how medical care is being delivered to patients in ways that materially affect the real estate needs of healthcare providers may enable you to position yourself as one of the winners and avoid being one of the losers in the real estate arena.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.