Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This holiday shopping season, millions of Americans will look to their social media friends or favorite bloggers for advice when deciding which gifts to buy. And with over 42 million blog sites in the United States alone, there are plenty of “peer” opinions to consider. See, “State of the Blogging World” Infographic at Blogging.org. But are consumer-generated product-related reviews or commentary always the mere opinion of the person posting them, as many readers may believe? What if the company whose product is the subject of the review had, in fact, exerted such influence over the reviewer that it affected what was written, turning a seemingly personal post into something more akin to advertising?
There's no question that in today's consumer marketplace, digital “word-of-mouth” reviews are a major influence on the purchasing decision. This new reality was expressly recognized by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) when it released its updated Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in 2009 (the Guides), 16 C.F.R. '255. The FTC included examples in Guides that made it clear that the FTC believed its authority to regulate commercial speech extends into a consumer's personal posts when a certain type of quid pro quo relationship between the consumer and advertiser exists. In the opinion of the FTC, when a benefit from the advertiser is exchanged for a positive consumer review, that consumer's post should no longer be considered merely to be her personal opinion, but instead must be seen as an endorsement and an advertising message, and subject to '5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. '45.
The Guides
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.