Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Medical malpractice suits involving nurses who are caring for patients at the end of life are rare. However, they can occur. Nurses can protect themselves by understanding the needs of patients and families at this critical time, by following approved standards of care and by thoroughly documenting their work.
Communication Is Key
A lawsuit is unlikely to occur if a patient/family understands and agrees with the care that is being given. First and foremost, nurses should listen to what patients and families are telling them. If a patient says, “I'm in pain,” it's important to say, “Tell me more about it.” Listening involves acknowledging what is being said, exploring patient goals and using body language that says “I hear you.”
Communication also means clarifying patient/family understanding of what is happening. It's easy to assume that they understand what is being told to them, when in reality they don't. For example, in one situation with a terminally ill cancer patient, the physician explained to him what would happen if his heart stopped. He used the phrase, “if your heart goes into asystole, we will have to call a code and intubate you.” The patient and wife nodded in agreement. After the doctor left, the nurse asked about their understanding of the conversation. The wife replied, “I haven't a clue.”
Helpful phrases when talking with patients and families about end-of-life care include:
Identify the Decision-Maker
The patient is generally considered the primary decision-maker when it comes to treatment. However, many times at the end of life, the patient is unable to communicate his or her wishes. It is therefore important to identify the person who is designated to make the medical decisions if the patient cannot speak. If the patient has an advance directive (living will), the decision-maker is known as the healthcare proxy, health care agent, or durable power of health care attorney. This is the person who is legally designated as the proxy decision-maker. Communication with this person is particularly important in cases where the family is in conflict about care decisions. Always ask:
When significant disagreement exists, and the patient cannot make decisions, a family conference that includes the physician and other members of the health care team can help; and nurses should advocate and be involved in these conferences. If the conflict cannot be resolved, nurses can play an important role in advocating for an ethics consult.
Standards of Practice
Nursing standards of practice exist regarding care for patients at the end of life. (See the American Nurses Association position paper on providing expert care at the end of life. http://bit.ly/14Axg7y.) These standards outline nursing responsibility for the provision of comfort, and include the expectation of expertise in the relief of physical, emotional and existential suffering.
Most liability claims arising from the care of dying patients are centered on treatment for pain, particularly the use of morphine and other opioids' (e.g., Dilaudid, Oxycodone, Fentanyl). Both under-treatment of pain and over-treatment of pain can trigger malpractice suits. Patients, families and medical providers often fear that the use of these drugs will cause “addiction” or will hasten death. Nurses can address these fears by:
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy
Many nurses fear that they can be held liable if they participate in the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy. This could mean withholding intravenous (IV) fluids for hydration, removing a patient from life-support or discontinuing a feeding tube. The United States Supreme Court, in the 1990 case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261, confirmed that there is no ethical or legal distinction between withholding or withdrawing treatments. At end of life, many of the life-sustaining treatments can cause pain and suffering for the patient. It is important for nurses to understand what the patient wants. To avoid liability, nurses should also follow institutional guidelines as well as state law.
Document, Document, Document
The old nursing adage, “If it wasn't documented, it wasn't done,” holds true in the case of a liability claim. Documentation means identifying the problem, demonstrating skilled assessment and intervention, and recording the results. Documentation should also include any discussion with the patient and family regarding treatment and care wishes.
Liability claims are least likely to occur when a patient or family feels they've been listened to and heard, when accepted standards of end-of-life care have been upheld and when the documentation reflects skilled and thoughtful intervention.
Medical malpractice suits involving nurses who are caring for patients at the end of life are rare. However, they can occur. Nurses can protect themselves by understanding the needs of patients and families at this critical time, by following approved standards of care and by thoroughly documenting their work.
Communication Is Key
A lawsuit is unlikely to occur if a patient/family understands and agrees with the care that is being given. First and foremost, nurses should listen to what patients and families are telling them. If a patient says, “I'm in pain,” it's important to say, “Tell me more about it.” Listening involves acknowledging what is being said, exploring patient goals and using body language that says “I hear you.”
Communication also means clarifying patient/family understanding of what is happening. It's easy to assume that they understand what is being told to them, when in reality they don't. For example, in one situation with a terminally ill cancer patient, the physician explained to him what would happen if his heart stopped. He used the phrase, “if your heart goes into asystole, we will have to call a code and intubate you.” The patient and wife nodded in agreement. After the doctor left, the nurse asked about their understanding of the conversation. The wife replied, “I haven't a clue.”
Helpful phrases when talking with patients and families about end-of-life care include:
Identify the Decision-Maker
The patient is generally considered the primary decision-maker when it comes to treatment. However, many times at the end of life, the patient is unable to communicate his or her wishes. It is therefore important to identify the person who is designated to make the medical decisions if the patient cannot speak. If the patient has an advance directive (living will), the decision-maker is known as the healthcare proxy, health care agent, or durable power of health care attorney. This is the person who is legally designated as the proxy decision-maker. Communication with this person is particularly important in cases where the family is in conflict about care decisions. Always ask:
When significant disagreement exists, and the patient cannot make decisions, a family conference that includes the physician and other members of the health care team can help; and nurses should advocate and be involved in these conferences. If the conflict cannot be resolved, nurses can play an important role in advocating for an ethics consult.
Standards of Practice
Nursing standards of practice exist regarding care for patients at the end of life. (See the American Nurses Association position paper on providing expert care at the end of life. http://bit.ly/14Axg7y.) These standards outline nursing responsibility for the provision of comfort, and include the expectation of expertise in the relief of physical, emotional and existential suffering.
Most liability claims arising from the care of dying patients are centered on treatment for pain, particularly the use of morphine and other opioids' (e.g., Dilaudid, Oxycodone, Fentanyl). Both under-treatment of pain and over-treatment of pain can trigger malpractice suits. Patients, families and medical providers often fear that the use of these drugs will cause “addiction” or will hasten death. Nurses can address these fears by:
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy
Many nurses fear that they can be held liable if they participate in the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy. This could mean withholding intravenous (IV) fluids for hydration, removing a patient from life-support or discontinuing a feeding tube. The United States Supreme Court, in the 1990 case of
Document, Document, Document
The old nursing adage, “If it wasn't documented, it wasn't done,” holds true in the case of a liability claim. Documentation means identifying the problem, demonstrating skilled assessment and intervention, and recording the results. Documentation should also include any discussion with the patient and family regarding treatment and care wishes.
Liability claims are least likely to occur when a patient or family feels they've been listened to and heard, when accepted standards of end-of-life care have been upheld and when the documentation reflects skilled and thoughtful intervention.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.