Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Money Transferred from Excess-Insurance Fund to Be Returned Under PA Accord
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has settled five years of litigation with several health-care provider groups over a $100 million transfer of funds from the Medical Care and Reduction of Error Fund (MCARE) to the commonwealth's general fund. Also part of the settlement, the commonwealth will recalculate the annual assessments it charges doctors for MCARE's excess medical malpractice insurance coverage. David E. Loder, counsel for one of the plaintiffs, The Hospital & Healthsystem Association, said, “I think the settlement essentially provides that no longer will the MCARE fund be able to generate these large surpluses on overpayments by the health care industry.”
CA Voters Decide Not to Raise Statutory Cap on Non-Economic Damages
California's citizens voted Nov. 4 not to raise the statutory limit on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases from $250,000 to $1.1 million. The increase, which the plaintiff bar supported, represents the inflation-adjusted value of the $250,000 limit imposed by the legislature in 1975 on med-mal noneconomic damages. In addition to the plaintiff bar, Proposition 46 was pushed by Internet entrepreneur Bob Pack, of Santa Barbara, who lost two children after they were struck by a car driven by a woman who was high on prescription drugs. The measure also sought to impose a requirement for drug testing of doctors, and would have mandated that doctors review a statewide patient database before prescribing medications, in order to prevent doctor-shopping.
'
Money Transferred from Excess-Insurance Fund to Be Returned Under PA Accord
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has settled five years of litigation with several health-care provider groups over a $100 million transfer of funds from the Medical Care and Reduction of Error Fund (MCARE) to the commonwealth's general fund. Also part of the settlement, the commonwealth will recalculate the annual assessments it charges doctors for MCARE's excess medical malpractice insurance coverage. David E. Loder, counsel for one of the plaintiffs, The Hospital & Healthsystem Association, said, “I think the settlement essentially provides that no longer will the MCARE fund be able to generate these large surpluses on overpayments by the health care industry.”
CA Voters Decide Not to Raise Statutory Cap on Non-Economic Damages
California's citizens voted Nov. 4 not to raise the statutory limit on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases from $250,000 to $1.1 million. The increase, which the plaintiff bar supported, represents the inflation-adjusted value of the $250,000 limit imposed by the legislature in 1975 on med-mal noneconomic damages. In addition to the plaintiff bar, Proposition 46 was pushed by Internet entrepreneur Bob Pack, of Santa Barbara, who lost two children after they were struck by a car driven by a woman who was high on prescription drugs. The measure also sought to impose a requirement for drug testing of doctors, and would have mandated that doctors review a statewide patient database before prescribing medications, in order to prevent doctor-shopping.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.