Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New Trends for Managing Privilege In e-Discovery

By Ali Waheed
November 30, 2014

As any corporation or law firm will attest, the cost of litigation continues to rise and with it the need to identify efficient solutions while maintaining transparency and defensibility. Document review, specifically, has long burdened litigation budgets; however, recent trends in the acceptance of technology integration and more advanced managed review workflows is taking root in the legal landscape. Litigation teams have been tasked with striking the right balance between identifying creative solutions to reduce these budgetary concerns while delivering high quality and defensible work product.

Federal Rule 26(b)(5) governs privilege disclosure during the discovery process by allowing the claiming party to withhold privileged information so long as: 1) a claim is expressly made; and 2) the nature of the documents are disclosed in a manner such that the adverse party is able to assess claims for privilege without being provided access to the underlying sensitive information. This mechanism is commonly referred to as a privilege log. Traditional privilege logs can generally be defined as a log of responsive data to be withheld on the grounds of privilege where the following information is provided: custodian, recipient list, communication date, subject and a privilege description/assertion.

Below we will touch on the burdens of traditional privilege logs and also alternatives to consider.

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?