Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the areas in which criminal and matrimonial law collide is in wiretap and eavesdropping laws. Not only are many matrimonial laws state-specific as to statute and judicial interpretation, but the various wiretap and eavesdropping laws throughout the nation are similarly disjointed. For example, while most states and the federal statute do not require the consent of all parties to a conversation, there is still a minority of approximately 12 states that do require all parties to consent. Add to that the constantly changing technology regarding communications, as well as differing definitions as to what constitutes a communication, and the confusion is multiplied.
Virtually all states have some sort of statute involving criminal penalties, as well as possible civil penalties. There is also a question of whether an illegal act is admissible in matrimonial cases. Generally it would seem that if something is obtained in violation of the state's wiretap laws, it would be inadmissible. But this is not always the case. Resorting to your particular state laws is essential. Updating that research is equally essential.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.