Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Are orders denying relief from the automatic stay pursuant to Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code considered final and, therefore, appealable as of right? This was the issue of first impression that was recently presented to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Pinpoint I Services, LLC v. Rivera (In re Atlas IT Export Corp.), 761 F.3d 177 (1st Cir. 2014). Until this decision, it was a question with a predictable answer ' yes. Predictable, because seven of the eight circuit courts that have considered this issue have reached the same result ' yes, such orders are final and appealable.
The First Circuit, however, mindful of avoiding the apparently observable herding phenomenon, rejected the blanket-rule approach in favor of what it describes as a more nuanced one which requires courts to be mindful of the multiple layers and many moving parts inherent in bankruptcy litigation while scouting for “finality indicators.” This article explores the reasoning behind the First Circuit's decision to create a circuit split rather than deciding the question presented by ruling on the merits.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.