Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) technology has reached critical mass. There are now very sophisticated aircraft that are easy to fly, cost less than a new television, and have the ability to record and broadcast video and other data. YouTube is full of videos showing UASs doing everything from delivering beer to recording events to videotaping real estate and natural attractions. While this may sound like a classic American success story, there is a fundamental problem: Most of this activity is illegal in the U.S., with no formal rules beyond a blanket prohibition on commercial operations. An additional challenge is predicting how existing tort laws will be applied to UASs. This article addresses both sets of issues.
Regulatory Landscape for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
The Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) has made it clear that all “commercial” UAS operations are prohibited absent special permission. This has led to the mistaken impression that if a UAS flight is made without money changing hands, then it is permitted. This is incorrect. The FAA recently clarified that when it indicated “commercial” operations are banned, it meant that UASs could be used only for “hobby or recreational” purposes. Docket No. FAA-2014-0396. Under this interpretation, a flight for any purpose other than enjoyment of flying the UAS is not allowed. Even charitable groups offering assistance with search and rescue efforts run afoul of this rule, despite the fact that the flights are performed by volunteers and no profit is made. See Texas Equusearch v. FAA, Docket No. 14-1061 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?